Posts Tagged ‘Bigot’

 

images (3)

THE SHADE OF BLACK AND WHITE IN AMERICA

THE SHADE OF BLACK AND WHITE IN AMERICA

Blacks and Whites have shared a love/hate relationship here in America. A lot and can be said about the dynamics and complexity of the history leading back to the shores of the Ivory Coast in West Africa. The subject has worn on my physic for longer than most of you can possibly imagine. Nevertheless, like a ketchup stain splattered on the kitchen wall becomes part of the wallpaper, we have become desensitized to the suffering experienced by the Black man here in America. I for one, do not have all the intellect to answer to this aged old dilemma plaguing our community. Therefore, I felt the need to evaluate, “The Shade of Black and White in America” in an attempt to better understand the challenges our country faces in the coming years.

Let’s lapse back in time for a moment when Rodney King was the focus of media attention. It is safe to say that the events leading up to the 1992 Los Angeles riots, were by and large contributed to the verdict handed down by a jury for the police involving the excessive use of force after detaining  Rodney King during a traffic stop. February 26, 2012 Trayvon Martin was gunned down by George Zimmerman; a wantna be police officer, in Sanford, Florida. The fatal shooting of the 17-year old African America by then 28 year old “neighborhood watch security guard caused pandemonium and unrest throughout the United states and abroad in the international community.

Now let’s flip the coin on the other side for a moment and evaluate the same set of circumstances but in this example the individual firing the weapon is a BLACK Woman, her name is Marissa Alexander.

She was convicted in 2012 under Florida’s 10-20-life law, which requires a mandatory minimum sentencing in certain crimes involving a firearm. Alexander was previously denied immunity under the state’s Stand Your Ground law. KEEP IN MIND” NO ONE” WAS INJURED. By the way George Zimmerman used the same defense, HE DIDN’T FIRE A WARNING SHOT AND KILLED A YOUNG BLACK MALE AND WAS FOUND INNOCENT.

Most recently a jury has found Michael Dunn, the Florida man accused of shooting an unarmed teenager to death during a dispute over loud music, guilty of four charges, but the jury was unable to reach a decision on the top count, first-degree murder. Dunn, who is white, fired 10 shots into an SUV, killing Jordan Davis, 17, who was black. The shooting in a convenience store parking lot in Jacksonville erupted after Dunn asked the teenagers in the vehicle to turn down their music.

Dunn was charged with first-degree murder, three counts of attempted second-degree murder and one count of firing into a vehicle in the Nov. 23, 2012, shooting. The jury couldn’t reach a decision on the first-degree murder charge, but convicted on the other four.

Dunn contended he acted in self-defense. Prosecutors suggested that Dunn, 47, was angry because he was being disrespected by a young black man.

Dunn was remanded to the custody of authorities. Sentencing, which could total as much as 75 years in prison, was set for around March 24.

The sequestered jury began its deliberations Wednesday, a week after opening statements began. That Dunn had fired into the SUV and killed Davis was never in question. What the jury had to determine was whether Dunn had acted in self-defense.

The proceedings are the latest in a series of murder cases with claims of self-defense that have roiled Florida and garnered national attention. George Zimmerman, who identifies as Latino, was acquitted of murdering an unarmed black teenager, Trayvon Martin, during a confrontation on Feb. 26, 2012. Another case, involving a former police captain accused of killing a man in a movie theater after a dispute over texting, is working its way through the courts.

As in the Zimmerman case, race has been a subtext in the Dunn trial. Prosecutors maintained that Dunn repeatedly shot at the black teenagers because they were playing their hip-hop music too loudly.

“This defendant was disrespected by a 17-year-old teenager, and he lost it. He wasn’t happy with Jordan Davis’ attitude. What was his response? ‘You’re not going to talk to me like that,’ ” Assistant State Atty. Erin Wolfson said. “He took these actions because it was premeditated. It was not self-defense.”

But Dunn’s attorney, Cory Strolla, pressed the self-defense claim and argued that Dunn had a right to shoot if he reasonably thought he was in danger.

“We understand Jordan Davis was human and this was a tragedy,” Strolla said. The attorney added later, “Deadly force is justifiable if Dunn reasonably believed he faced an attempted murder of himself or another.”

Florida’s “stand your ground” law allows the defense to seek a special hearing to receive immunity from prosecution before a trial. Dunn did not choose to go that route, but argued that he had acted in self-defense because he thought there was a weapon in the car and he feared for his life.
http://www.latimes.com/nation/nationnow/la-na-nn-michael-dunn-loud-music-verdict-20140213,0,5446202.story#ixzz2uw7uPT57

This is no attempt to open up any old wounds, too many people have already had to deal with the pain of having to lay to rest one of our children for a senseless act. And being the father of two young black males I know what Travyon Martin’s parents must have felt when they were told their son’s life had been senselessly taken.

So at what point is there value placed on the life of an African American? Well, putting it bluntly as history has shown us, “The only time a black man’s life has value is when a white man takes it.” Now, I know that is a hell of a position to take but at some point we have to own up to this crisis in order for there to be any change. As far as I’m concerned, anytime there is an act of violence or heinous crime perpetrated against a man of color by any person, then that person should full the weight of the law on his shoulders. Regardless of his race. Our black leaders should be marching in the black communities right now in protest of the black on black crime being committed at an alarming rate. Our so-called leaders remind me of the ambulance chasers looking for a settlement playing the race card.

I think it’s Ludicrous that we as a race of people have embraced the word,” Nigga”, which was created by the white man at a time when the black man was treated in-humanly. I find it ironic that WE as a race of people embrace such a derogatory word and psychologically use it and feel somehow empowered by using it against ourselves. A very large percent of African Americans will be offended if they heard a Caucasian using the term nigga or nigger. In a study I recently conducted in Los Angeles, CA a black man said in no uncertain terms, “Only a black can call another black a nigga.” What sense does that make? It’s that same warped mentality used to justify the out of control crime rate prevalent in the African American community today.

So apparently, everything is copacetic with the high crime rate and black on black violence as long as we are causing havoc in our own communities and we are responsible for taking the life of another black man.  Now, when an individual of another ethnic persuasion, ie., (Caucasian) takes the life of a brother it’s revered as an outrage.  This type of behavior has plagued our community long enough.

First of all, it has to be established anytime violence rears its ugly head in our community, we as a people will do everything within our power to eradicate the cause, at all cost. Which means championing a cause to speak out against violence in our community. I’m not talking about the gated communities or the subdivisions with expensive HOA fees. I am talking about good common-sense resolve for a condition rapidly spiraling out of control.

The Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) notes that most crime is intra-racial. Which means there is something called, (“WHITE ON WHITE”) crime, (“Korean on Korean”) crime, etc… According to the Justice Statistics the White on White crime rate is 84%. Simply put, all races kill within their own race, but this isn’t to make light of the staggering statistic related to Black on Black violence. Now just because White’s kill White’s and Hispanics kill Hispanics don’t make me sleep at night. I’m concern about the violence plaguing our city streets. We as a race of people have to reevaluate our current situation before we’re not left with anyone at the finish line.

 

 

images (57)What’s up? This is your man; the one and only, Maestro checking in.  A lot has been said since the taped recordings of Donald Sterling bigot rant invaded our airwaves. It’s not often I’m disturbed by people actions but the way Donald Sterling is acting is appalling and extremely offensive.  Now there may be those of you who ascribe to the notion that Donald Sterling’s comments are protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. Let’s not forget what season this country was in when the Constitution was created. The First Amendment of the United States Constitution (“protects speech no matter how offensive its content”). But this article isn’t about the horrible failed policies of this government. That’s a topic for another time. This is about commerce…Plain and simple. So the question is, “Can The NBA Force Donald Sterling to sell the LA CLIPPERS?

Before we jump head first into this topic, let’s take a look at what the Constitution says about free speech.  Free speech rights are indivisible. Why else could the (“NWA”) be allow to scream “Fuck the Police” in their lyrics or when (“Guns N’ Roses”) aired the song “One In A Million” the band tailored it’s image to appeal to white, heterosexual, nativity prejudices, denouncing blacks, immigrants and gays while coyly apologizing “to those who may images (51)have taken offense”. Restricting the speech of one group or  an individual jeopardizes everyone’s right because the same laws or regulations used to bigots can be used to silence you. Laws that defend free speech for bigots like Donald Sterling can be used to defend rights of civil rights workers, anti war protesters, lesbian and gay activists and others fighting for justice.

So let’s deal with this topic rationally and remove the emotional instigation away from the equation…Shall we? Everyone is so quick to play the race card. Real talk, are you really shocked an old wealthy Caucasian living in America is a bigot? I’m not making light of the situation at all, but sometimes you have to laugh to hide the tears. This isn’t about free speech or playing the race card. It’s about Commercial Law, i.e., Franchise Agreements and Contracts. Donald Sterling’s advisers are not idiots. They understand actually what Donald Sterling is doing and advised him to do so. He can’t be that stupid! Or can he?

In recent years, a rise in verbal abuse and violence directed at people of color, lesbians and gay images (36)men, and other historically persecuted groups have plagued the United States. Among the settings of these expressions of intolerance are the NBA, which is where the heart of this discussion lies. Outrage, indignation and demands for Donald Sterling to relinquish his rights as owner of the LA CLIPPERS has greeted the incident–understandably, given the ethical diversity of the players in the NBA.

The NBA is a Brand  or Corporate entity created long before Donald Sterling purchased his “Franchise Team” the LA CLIPPERS.  That’s why Donald Sterling receives checks from the NBA via a Franchisor/Franchisee agreement. Which means there are certain rules and regulations established for the owners to adhere to or he/she will be subject to DEFAULT/TERMINATION. Allow me to give you an example. If someone purchases a McDonald’s Franchise they wouldn’t be allowed to sell pigs feet at the counter or hang banners inimages (4) the window of their favorite politician who’s running for office. The individual may have purchased a Franchise but they don’t outright buy McDonald. Therefore, McDonald’s reserves the right to TERMINATE an agreement with one of it’s “Franchise Owner” if they are in clear violation of said agreement.

In the “Franchise Agreement” of the United States Basketball League pursuant to ARTICLE 13 DEFAULT/TERMINATION section (n) “if you, or any person controlling, controlled by or under common control with you, fails to conduct the United States Basketball League, here and after (“USBL”) Franchise is full compliance with applicable law or regulation. The “Franchise Agreement” also states in part, “Upon the images (3)occurrence of any of the events of default as set forth above, we may, without prejudice to any other rights or remedies contained in this Franchise Agreement or provided by law or equity, terminate this Franchise Agreement”. see Franchise Agreement — United States Basketball League.

So the question is, “Will the NBA support the bigot or stand by their brand?” In my humble opinion, “I don’t think so”.

 

 

All rights and photos of the NBA logo and players are the property of the NBA

Article written by Maestro May 14, 2014

Revised May 14, 2014

Jessie Owens a USA  sprinter and long jumper redefined track and field as we knew it at the Olympics in 1936 winning 4-gold  medals. He broke records almost every time he competed. Hitler along with countless others were annoyed that the negro, Jessie Owens had won so many gold medals. He said with a shrug; “their (“African-Americans”) were stronger than those of civilized whites and hence should be excluded from future games.” Sounds familiar? Well, Jimmy the Geek, Oh I meant, “Greek”, made a similar comment on January 16, 1988. He said; and I quote ” The Black is a better athlete to begin with because he’s been bred to be that way, because of his thighs that goes up into his back, and they jump higher and he’s bred to be the better athlete because this goes back all the way to the civil war when during the slave trade…the sdownload (13)lave owner would breed his big Black to his big woman so that he could have a big Black kid.” [end quote]

In 2007 MSNBC’s in the Morning host, Don Imus, referred to the Rutgers University women’s Basketball team, which was made up of eight African-American and only two white players, as “nappy-headed hoes”. Now I’m no rocket scientist, but what possess these men to think it was OK to disrespect a race of people on national television. Take a moment to look at the video below and tell me what major network would have allowed their host to carry on like they were having a conversation at a strip bar. Fortunately, like Jimmy the Greek (“as seen to the left”), Don Imus, felt the raft of a civil societies conscious on race and they  were forced off their high horse.

 

 

 

This is your man Maestro weighing in on the situation and it goes without saying that this is the type of shit that causes so many problems with race relations here in America. Unless you’ve been asleep underneath a rock you have already heard about the scandal surrounding the LA Clippers owner, Donald Sterling and his true feelings about Black people. “Come-on Man!” Are you serious? Here is a guy who has built an empire on the physical talents of Black athletes and he has the nerve to tell his (“ass on the side”) that she  shouldn’t bring any Blacks to his game. If you ask me, it sounds like “Donald” has stuck his foot into his mouth.  Some of you may argue that it was a private conversation and it should not have been taped. Fruit of a poisonous tree hold true in this case. What’s done in the dark will eventually come to the light.  As far as I’m concerned, I will not under any circumstances attend another LA Clipper game as long as he has something to do with that franchise. But I have to take my hat off to Adam Silver, and I don’t do that for anyone, for taking a stance against the Racist Bigot by banding him from the league indefinitely. So what’s the moral of this story?  If you are going to put yourself out there, be ready to suffer the consequences of being ignorant. download (14)

 

Written by Maestro